|
|
I'm giving out tens like candy today!
*sigh. How I wish I could go back to the days of having impacted wisdom teeth.
I know I've said that before. It's just that I have no desire to risk my freedom buying illegal drugs, and I'm not going to shoot up until my 80th birthday, but I really love opaites, and I'd like some more. |
| [Reply to this comment] |
Damn.
| by GFDman | (mike at godfuckingdamnit point com) | | on Oct 21, 2003 01:16:16 PM | | (#10507) |
|
|
I WAS thinking about maybe going out to get something to eat for lunch, but, shit... Fuck that, I'm gonna go score some opium.
|
| [Reply to this comment] |
or maybe
| by bobby | (shutyourface@irule.com) | | on Oct 21, 2003 01:56:17 PM | | (#10516) |
|
|
| he's just trying to gain momentum by bleeding the sympathy vein. hollywood is so predictable. us losers get to do anti-depressants... wheeeeee. the only reason i stopped doing drugs is cuz i couldn't get any good stuff. he's a selfish pig. well written. |
| [Reply to this comment] |
|
| Not to sound like an after school special, but I think drugs are for losers. If you can't face life without mind-altering substances, that makes you a coward in my view. I was neutral on Limbaugh before (viewing him as a political Jerry Springer), but now I look at him with a mix of disdain and pity. As for the destroying one's life bit, it depends on if you've got a life to destroy. I doubt Rush will be making any more money out of politics, at the very least. |
| [Reply to this comment] |
|
He'll find God again and all the conservatives will forgive him.
Why would you say you're sorry for having an opinion? Oh, I see it's because your opinion is needlessly judgemental. There a lot more reasons to take drugs than needing something to help you "face life." Sure, lots of people use it as an escape. Just an many people (those who are in control of thier lives and don't fuck up, so you don't hear it on the news) engage in it recreationally - you know, for fun. You know, like soccer, or knitting, or poetry slams.... |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
drugs 4 fun and profit
 
|
|
sorry. couldn't resist.
I'm one of those people who're not on drugs, but maybe I ought to be?
Rush Limburger is an idiot. Even more than me!  |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Are you just drawn to Gribble?

|
|
| If you've got nothing better to do than post about what an idiot you are, please stop wasting my bandwidth. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
|
Needlessly judgemental? Things get judged all the time, whether there's a need or not. As for soccer, knitting, and poetry slams; these are things that don't chemically alter your brain. Also, I think you could choose not to engage in a poetry slam with no ill effects, but drugs take a somewhat tighter hold. And when is the last time you heard of someone dying from a poetry overdose?
But you do score one point, some people just do it for recreation's sake. I just think there are less foolish ways to spend your leisure time. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Wrong again, and again

|
|
Soccer does chemically alter your brain, if you play hard enough, with endorphins. Poetry slams? Yep, they do it too. Adrenaline. Knitting I dunno about, I don't knit. Any knitter waanna take a stab at this?
Hyuck. Too much oxygen can kill you. I see people around me dying of long term fat poisoning all the time. Turns out that a really fatty meal can send an abused heart over the edge, much like an overdose of speed. Every single thing that you put in your body has consequneces, and drugs are not the only ones that can fuck you up bigtime if you don't take proper cautions. Every single emotion you have is chemically triggered, and drugs can be used to balance or encourage the emotional states you wish to achieve. It's not like I take a Vicodin and sit there feeling the Vicodin. I use drugs to heighten the effects of an already full life, and I do it rarely. You don't use drugs, fine. You think you're better than someone who does, piss off. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Baby, I think I'm better than lots of people.
  
|
|
| Mostly just an overinflated ego, but in the case of drug users, I think it stands on its own merits. In any case, if you get your endorphins naturally, you've earned them. Even after the fact, you can look back and remember that hot chick, or kick-ass game of soccer, or even that unmatched piece of embroidery you once did. If you get your endorphins with drugs, its nothing more than an illusion, you're happy over nothing, and once the high is over, you're left with nothing more than you had beforehand. This is pitiful, in my estimation. Even you, who take drugs to "enhance an already full life". Can't be all that full. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
"Naturally"
 
|
|
What a crock.
You don't ever eat refined sugar? Mood enhancer that leaves you flat. Addictive. Unnatural, as well as exploitative of sugar workers. Oh, I'm sorry, you are quite sure that all your sugar comes from sugar beets produced in the US, picked by legal, well-paid farm workers? I could list many, many legal substances that change the body in ways that are highly sought after by scads of people, and you use lots and lots of them. For christ's sake, a diuretic can be an anti depressant for a constipated person.
Pu-lease. You're just making different, legal choices about which drugs you use, but you're using drugs. You're affecting your physical makeup with the things that you choose to put in your body. Here's the thing; it's your body,. you get to make those choices. Your choices are obviously right for you, but you don't live anyone else's life. They live those lives, and a beer and a toke isn't going to to make them a bad person, or a weak one. Personally, I have no interest in pursuing an endorphin high by stressing my body past a pain barrier. If I want to get high, I'll open the well stocked cabinet of American Pharmaceutical wonders and pick my experience. Or I'll go to a poetry slam and read my crap in front of an audience. Here's something you may not know - the experince, in the end, is no different, really. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Thanks, you make it so easy!
 
|
|
| Just a hint, most of us stop referring to 'mommy' once we pass grade school. You did pass grade school, right? |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
|
Obviously, anyone who thinks drugs are bad has bought into the propaganda machine and can't possibly be thinking for themselves.
So here's another rationale against drugs, which perhaps you haven't heard before. I dislike the fact that you can get happiness from a pill; you don't have to work for it, you don't have to accomplish anything, nor contribute anything to the society of which you are a part. There is no impetus to do anything beyond what it takes to get the happy pill. All the previous markers of achievement become meaningless. Forget making yourself happy by doing for others, oh hell no, just pop that pill or stick that needle and you're flying high. But see, those previous markers of achievement had to be worked for, and by doing that work, society as a whole benefits.
As more people become non-contributing members of society, that leaves more for the rest of us to do. Our society falls behind and is surpassed by other societies, but pretty soon we'll all be too blitzed to give a shit. Personally, I see this as a great tragedy for our country, but patriotism has gone out the window too. GFD. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
you're a god damn drama queen
| by cxreg | (cxreg@godfuckingdamnit.com) | | on Oct 22, 2003 12:11:26 AM | | (#10595) |
|
|
You're free to dislike things that come easy. You're free to drink spring water and eat grass and be the most natural person on earth. Do what you want. Just fucking let other people do it to.
Yeah, I'm sure those 3 laps around your block are exactly what's driving the US economy. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Are you just going to hurl abuse?
 
|
|
| Or are you going to back that up with something? Where do you get "drama queen"? Or is that what you call people who actually do have well-reasoned opinions? I don't believe you've addressed a single point from my argument. To wit: if you can get what you want without working for it, your incentive to do useful things plummets, and a smaller quantity of useful things happens overall as a result. In the end, we all suffer. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
there might be good points here
| by cxreg | (cxreg@godfuckingdamnit.com) | | on Oct 22, 2003 12:17:02 AM | | (#10597) |
|
|
if he didn't keep dragging it kicking and screaming back to "people who ruin their lives and don't contribute to society". fact remains, you can indulge such behavior with ANYTHING, one of which is controlled substances, another of which is the mother fucking cheeseburger.
he simply cannot distinguish and/or accept the difference between people who have no control over themselves and their impulses, and people who choose what to do with their body
i think we have a Jeb Bush constituent here |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
A parable.

|
|
We have two heroin junkies in our basement. One holds a steady job and pays rent. The other is a total fuckup and leeches off of the first. Both have a five bag a day habit.
Moral: Some people just plain suck.
|
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
i think the moral is...
| by bobby | (shutyourface@irule.com) | | on Oct 27, 2003 08:55:26 AM | | (#10834) |
|
|
| drugs and alcohol: means to an end or end itself ? drugs and alcohol are used for all sorts of reasons: recreation, relaxtion, mood altering, mind expansion, social acceptance, etc. however, if you're just hanging out with them all the time they just become the end itself. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Capitalism all the way, brother.
|
|
It really is a capitalist argument, at heart. In capitalism, rewards come to those that work the hardest. All this hard work benefits society as a whole, so everybody wins. People are free to be as slack as they wish, but will probably end up living in a cardboard box. The problem as I see it, is that anything that removes that impetus to work hard robs society of the efforts of people who would otherwise need to contribute in order to win happiness, or at least a roof over their heads. Granted, as others have pointed out ad nauseam, there are those that use and still contribute, but I would argue that their contributions are lessened. On the flip side, maybe they have to work even harder to support that 5-bag habit...but its just as likely that this would lead to crime.
The socialist systems of Europe, on the other hand, remove this impetus as a matter of legislation. The social welfare programs in place have a detrimental effect that can be witnessed in European unemployment levels. Their tax rates are rising as a result, and the ongoing clashes over 'pension reform' are also symptomatic. The lesson is that forcing a dwindling workforce to carry an increasing load of freeloaders is a great way to ruin an economy. To get back on topic though, it makes more sense to do drugs in Europe, as they'll guarantee your livlihood there. It just happens to be a bad fit for our socio-economic model. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
|
| I'd wager that work harder than you, and make more money than you, and pay more taxes than you, every day, and I probably always will. I'd wager that I also help more people than you in my daily life, by both volunteering my time and my money to those causes that I believe deserve my funding. So suck it, you sanctimonious prick. Drug use in and of itself is not a moral issue, and the only people that must make it so are those who have no real ethics to base thier actions on, so they choose arbitrary elements to judge others by. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
It is not physically impossible
|
|
To "help others" while you're high, you know.
And honestly, I don't get happiness out of drugs. Happiness comes from the rest of my life. Drugs just make things look a little different, so I can see them from other angles.
Oh, christ, why I waste my time talking to you, I don't know. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
|
| Of course, it might be that you have time in great abundance, and nothing better to do. In any case, are you incapable of looking at things from other angles without some sort of pill? I would certainly hope not. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Why should I have to work for everything?
|
|
I go out to dinner, I pay a man I don't know to give me food and make me happy. I did not have to prepare and labor over that meal to get a little bit of happiness from it, I asked for it, and I got it. It's the same thing with drugs. Sometimes, I just want to pay someone I don't know for something so that I can relax and feel good. Like eating out, it's not something you can do all the time, but it's nice once in a while. And it doesn't mean I'm unhappy with life because I like to feel funny once in a while.
Is eating in restaurants for losers, too?
|
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Hyuk.

|
|
I dislike the fact that you can get happiness from a pill; you don't have to work for it, you don't have to accomplish anything, nor contribute anything to the society of which you are a part.
Yes, because true happiness should always come at the expense of TERRIBLE CONSEQUENCES.
|
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Oh, I don't actually do many drugs
|
|
A vocodin or two once or twice year, a beer here and there. Anything other than that is too much trouble to get safely, or not the high I'm looking for.
My point is, you're pegging people as "druggies" based on an arbitrary line drawn in the sand of possible substances to enjoy by Nancy Reagan. You use substances yourself. Who the fuck are you to judge which ones are acceptable, based on the political machinations of a woman who presided over one of the largest, most unjust jailings of American Citizens in history?
Gawd - you've just bought the propoganda, hook, line, and sinker. Howzabout you expunge every substance that affects mood from your intake for a year, and then come back and act superior. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
|
| I find it amusing how you attempt to tar all of society with the same brush in an attempt to rationalize your own behavior. There is, however, a big fuckin' difference between the caffeine in a cup of coffee and the concentrated chemicals to be found in a vicodin tablet. It's not all or nothing, sweetie. There is use, and there is abuse. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Nope, I'm not backpedaling.
|
|
| You're the one who assumed that because I admit to using drugs, that I must be a raving addict. You're the one who assumes that anyone who uses recreationally must be abusing steadily. You make too many assumptions with no real information to back it up. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
|
I'll point out that at no time did I make such an accusation. Freudian slip, maybe? I've made generalizations, yes, but I never said "Gribble is a drug addict." Basically what I've said is that I think drug abusers are weak people that can't face reality without a crutch. I think that if your life is as full as you claim, you probably shouldn't need to pop the occasional vicodin, but it's your body to fuck up.
|
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
That's crux of it, that word "need"
|
|
I need to pet my cat. I need to use the bathroom. I need to eat food, to breathe, to shower when I get stinky. I don't need to pop vicodin. Sometimes, I like to.
You're right, you never called me a raving addict. You have (at least by inference if not outright) called me a drug abuser, which I resent. I'm a drug user. Abuse is my its very nature behavior that allows the desire to use the drug to overtake other, more important concerns in life. I may be a masturbation abuser, but not drugs.
You're going to live happily in your little black and white world, until one day someone you know and respect and care about turns out to be a recreational drug user. And that person will change your mind, or you will lose a great and valuable relationship. I wish you the best. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Thanks for the good wishes.

|
|
I realize that not all is black and white, and I do have people close to me (very close) that abuse. I don't like it, I pity them for it, but because I love them I keep that to myself. Just because someone has a character flaw, that doesn't mean that I would write them off.
Ah, masturbation abuse. And a while back, blowjobs at SCA gatherings. Gribble, I find you textually attractive.  |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
|
You actually admitted to being involved with the SCA. That's where macho assholes go so they don't have to feel faggoty about going to a Renn Faire.
All your credibility just went down the toilet. Wanker. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Gatherings of *which* SCA?
|
|
I hold that BJs would be thinkable - and perhaps even common - at each and every one of these associations' meetings. At least in a figurative sense.
1. Scottish Canoe Association
2. Secular Coalition for America
3. Sexual Compulsives Anonymous
4. Société en commandite par actions - a type of corporation, in France
5. Society for Creative Anachronism
6. Student Conservation Association - a Non-Profit Conservation Service Organisation
7. Student Catholic Action - a religious student organization in the Philippines
8. Subsidiary Communications Authority - the FCC's name for subcarrier channels transmitted on a broadcast FM station
9. Suez Canal Authority - a state-owned authority which own and maintain the Suez Canal.
10. Supreme Council of Antiquities - the Egyptian anquities service
11. Sydney College of the Arts
(List courtesy of wikipedia) |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
going to be even more famous
|
|
| he found the honey pot, can't you see that! He's a "repenting sinner" and lots of free publicity |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Long Rant Trying For Slow Readers

|
|
| I had a hard time focusing on your speed induced rant. It's a good thing you divided it into sections with leading questions. Your copy and paste skills are pretty remarkable, but the required expression of GFD foul language is not achieved, so I gave you a 2. |
| [Reply to this comment] |
uh, rush is a motherfucker;
  
|
|
assmunching sodomite cockeating bedwetting sycophantic republican anal-cysting smackhead pee-drinker.
does that up my score?
p.s. ctrl-v  |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
you might be right about smack what's made by pfizer
|
|
| but i've seen some proper smack heads and they aren't even able to function on a naked lunch level. my gf's sister is a smack head in the classical sense, and she has can't talks and can't jawk's disease. in addition to the bosploded dialect, mumbly joe talking, and whining cat inflections, she's a evil bitch of the first class order. Oh, and since their family likes to put pictures of their kids everywhere you get to see a before and after smack everywhere she goes. let me tell you, this girl was once quite fetching. now her face is sallow and blemished, the only expression it can half manage is a scowl, her teeth are like baked beans, and her figure is so imaciated she's less like a deliah's model and more like an incan mummy. In short, I wouldn't fuck her with your dick. |
| [Reply to this comment] |
"Her teeth are like baked beans."
|
|
Good Christ, that was the funniest fucking line I've ever read in my life.
However, I reiterate my own, and paraphrase Gribble's, points above: drugs don't ruin people. People ruin themselves, with or without drugs. |
| [Reply to this comment] [Parent] |
Don't forget...
| by lester | (jojopotato86@yahoo.com.au) | | on May 23, 2007 11:37:54 AM | | (#24086) |
|
|
| ...the lovely sexual side effects of opiates. My girlfriend and I used to take them and have crazy, 12-hour fuckfests. Those was the days. |
| [Reply to this comment] |
|